12/9/2022 0 Comments Macfusion reddit![]()
If you don't get enough people to help you then you have to put more time into it, but time is money. #MACFUSION REDDIT CODE#Well it's open source so you ask for other devs on Github to contribute, but many don't, it's difficult to get familiar with a large code base when you aren't being paid to and getting publicly involved with a project this large can be intimidating. #MACFUSION REDDIT FREE#Fast forward 6 years and you have devoted hours and hours of your life to this code base, you care about it, but you can no longer spend the time required for free, it's eating into your livelihood and free time, so what do you do? Then that code got really popular and people started asking for feature requests and patches, and the bigger it gets the more these requests come in. The author didn't start FUSE as a planned revenue stream, he started it like we all start writing FOSS, there was a need and he wrote some code. I think this misses the point and overlooks the evolution of the project. If our economy was structured to encourage cooperation and reuse of each other’s work I think OSS would be a lot more sustainable and pleasant to do. To me, this shows a flaw in assuming that more profit potential -> better products. OSS just isn’t well suited as profitable products, but still is tremendously successful despite this. It provides huge benefits, and it would be able to provide even more if it was incentivized for people to work on OSS projects, which our economic system does not (see contracts forbidding side projects, developers having to maintain projects in spare time since they need a job to pay rent/not starve). Who would just give away free stuff with no strings attached? OSS exists outside of our transactional economy. This is hard to even think about within the context of how our economy is structured implicitly, we all expect projects to want to give utility at the cost of some kind of payment (whether a purchase or donation). We all understand and benefit from OSS it works like a sort of gift economy, where people in a community give products away without expecting compensation. To me this shows a major disconnect between our capitalist economy and OSS. ![]() ![]() You need either a passion, or a sponsor, or an alternate strategy, if you want to make a profit. I love Open Source, I wouldn't be an IT guy and developer without it. You need an ecosystem to establish these profit goals. There are OSS models of compensation (mostly based around support), but those require an established consumer base and an institutional need to pay for support (aka, being red hat certified). I always see OSS companies fold with a big pikachu face when they realize that the world won't support the company out of good will. You cannot, should not, rely on donations as a revenue stream. #MACFUSION REDDIT SOFTWARE#People will always use free software without compensation if it's the path of least resistance. The companies that can make money out of OSS are the exception, not the rule. It expects people to do projects out of a passion, and it expects to attract developers out of a similar vein to contribute. OSS is what makes the world run, and it has a fantastic community, and that community works on the currency of reciprocation. Jason Kaiser on Making the Home and End Keys work in Eclipse 3.Honestly, if you are thinking about doing an open source project, don't ever expect it to be viable from a monetary standpoint.Nisarg on 9 Things I learnt while moving data from RedShift into AWS Elastic Search with AWS Lambda.on 9 Things I learnt while moving data from RedShift into AWS Elastic Search with AWS Lambda. #MACFUSION REDDIT MAC OSX#
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |